SAT-Fire NewsLeTTer #08.2018
August 2018


Is the United States under military rule i.e. martial law?

Is the United States under martial law? 

Is the United States under martial law?

According to the United States Congress we have been as a nation in a state of national emergency for greater than 60 years- http://archive.org/stream/mergenc00unit/mergenc00unit_djvu.txt
S.R. 1170; 94th Congress / Report 2d Session No 94 _ 92 2
NATIONAL EMERGENCIES AND DELEGATED EMERGENCY POWERS FINAL REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL EMERGENCIES AND DELEGATED EMERGENCY POWERS … Mat 28, 1976. — Ordered to be printed

The aforementioned information as part of the federal registry and as such it is construed, considered law. But, what exactly did Congress say and what was their intent?

Passage of the NATIONAL EMERGENCIES Act will be a major step toward restoring Congress to its proper legislative role. The legislation represents significant progress in checking the growth of Executive power and returning the United States to normal peacetime processes. The measure is vital in insuring that the United States travels a road marked by legislative oversight and carefully constructed legal safeguards.

But if you pay special attention to the phrase “toward restoring Congress to its proper legislative role”, “in checking the growth of executive power and returning the United States to normal... processes”, you will see that something isn’t as it seems.

The legislation is long overdue. A majority of Americans alive today have lived their entire lives under EMERGENCY RULE. Since 1933. Protections and procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by Executive directives whose legality rests on the continued existence of Presidentially proclaimed states of EMERGENCY. For more than forty years, EMERGENCY authority intended for use in crisis situations has been available to the Executive. The President has had EXTRAORDINARY POWERS — POWERS to seize property and commodities, seize control of transportation and communications, organize and control the means of production, assign military forces abroad, and restrict travel.

Flexible Rates

This dangerous state of affaire is a direct result of Congress' failure to establish effective means for the handling of emergencies and Its willingness to defer to Executive branch leadership. In the face of the wars, emergencies, and crises and determined Presidents of the past forty years, the Congress, through its own actions has transferred awesome magnitudes of power to the Executive without ever examining the cumulative effect of that DELEGATION of responsibility. It has tolerated and condoned Executive initiatives without fulfilling its own constitutional responsibilities. It has in important respects permitted the Executive branch to draft and in large measure to make the law. This has occurred despite the constitutional responsibility CONFERRED on Congress by Article I. Section 8 of the Constitution which states that it is Congress that "makes all Laws. . . ."

Business Solutions

Most people as was stated by Congress never realized this: For more than forty (now 85) years, EMERGENCY authority intended for use in crisis situations has been available to the Executive. The President has had EXTRAORDINARY POWERS — POWERS to seize property and commodities, seize control of transportation and communications, organize and control the means of production, assign military forces abroad, and restrict travel.
This dangerous state of affaire is a direct result of Congress' failure to establish effective means for the handling of emergencies and Its willingness to defer to Executive branch leadership.”

Opening Hours

This situation started with the election of Pres. Franklin Delano Roosevelt in March 1933, immediately upon seizing the presidency, Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued an executive order (see presidential proclamation 2038) convening an emergency session of Congress, and ordering Congress to convene on March 9, 1933 (this was done almost immediately after being sworn in). On or about March 6, 1933 the president issued a second executive order (see presidential proclamation 2039) declaring a national banking holiday, suspending any and all banking “normal” activity for a total of six (24 hr) days. On or about March 9, 1933 Congress amended the trading with the enemy’s act of October 6, 1917 section B with the March 9, 1933 act. Pres. Roosevelt introduced these proclamations under the authority granted the executive branch by the October 6, 1917 act, a military act thus the proclamations were enacted by the president acted acting under his military capacity. Thus, the national emergency is a military governance act authorized by Congress, with the executive branch, the congressional branch, and the judicial branch of government being suspended. This is not our opinion, for notice what Congress said next:

...declaration of EMERGENCY triggers numerous laws which, taken together, give the President EXTRAORDINARY power...


The continuation of these states of EMERGENCY was significant, since any declaration of EMERGENCY triggers numerous laws which, taken together, give the President EXTRAORDINARY power. The following laws are illustrative: Statute 10 USC 712 permits the President "during a war or a declared NATIONAL EMERGENCY" to ''detail members of the Army. Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps to assist in military matters" in any foreign country.


Under 10 USC 333, the President can use the militia or armed forces to suppress "conspiracy," if it is likely that "any part" of the people in a state will be deprived of some constitutional rights, and the state itself refuses to act. Under this statute, the President conceivably could circumvent Article IV. Section 4, of the Constitution even before waiting for state legislatures or state executives to request Federal troops. Under IS USC 1383. the President has authority to declare any part or all of the United States military zones. People in such zones can be jailed for a year for violating any "executive order of the President." Would these arrests be reviewable in court \ It is not clear Judicial review of agency actions is guaranteed in 5 USC 702, but 5 USC 701 excludes actions taken under declarations of martial law.

A President could make use of Public Law 733, which expresses the determination of the United States to prevent "by whatever means may be necessary including the use of arms, any "subversive" activities by the government of Cuba.

Under 47 USC 308, the Federal Communications Commission could, during a NATIONAL EMERGENCY, modify existing broadcast licenses under terms it might prescribe'. Under 47 USC 606, the President can amend "as he sees fit" the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission and, in particular, can "cause the closing of any facility or station for wire communications."

If the President finds the nation "threatened by attack," he could, under 44 USC 1505, cease to publish his regulations in the Federal Register if he determines that it is "impracticable." This could open the way to promulgation of secret laws.

Once again notice: . . . Under IS USC 1383. the President has authority to declare any part or all of the United States military zones. People in such zones can be jailed for a year for violating any "executive order of the President." Would these arrests be reviewable in court \ It is not clear Judicial review of agency actions is guaranteed in 5 USC 702, but 5 USC 701 excludes actions taken under declarations of martial law…

Mobirise

Acting under military authority/act:

Acting under military authority/act:
Now let’s notice with keen interest Pres. Franklin Delano Roosevelt stating that he is acting under the authority granted to him under the trading with the enemy act of October 6, 1917: Whereas those conditions have created a national emergency; and
Whereas it is provided in Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended, "That the President may investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange and the export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency . . .";
and
Whereas it is provided in Section 16 of the said Act "That whoever shall willfully violate any of the provisions of this Act or of any license, rule, or regulation issued thereunder, and whoever shall willfully violate, neglect, or refuse to comply with any order of the President issued in compliance with the provisions of this Act, shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000, or, if a natural person, imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both . . .";
Now, Therefore I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, in view of such national emergency and by virtue of the authority vested in me by said Act… Proclamation 2039—Declaring Bank Holiday ‘s

March 6, 1933
This was nothing more and nothing less than a military seizing of power, if you will look for the definition of the meaning of “military seizing power”, you will find the word “coup”. The Supreme Court was powerless, the United States Congress was powerless, why? Because Congress had delegated its authority to the president of the United States to operate under his military capacity, to control, to regulate, to prohibit, to arrest, to seize property. This is once again not our opinion, Congress has documented that they violated the Constitution by delegating their authority, their power, their duty to make law, by subjugating the Constitution, and the separation of powers clause in granting their legislative authority and power to the president in an extraordinary way through extraordinary measures, note the title of the special committee report “1976 SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL EMERGENCIES AND DELEGATED EMERGENCY POWERS”
The separation of powers clause has no provision for the delegation of so-called powers during an emergency, since the delegation of power was limited, specific, and the prohibition was binding and could not be nullified.
Many people have heard of the Constitution being suspended, many people have heard that the United States is under military rule, so now we will present what Congress further had to say about this delegation of powers in the 1940s:

"...Under 10 USC 333, the President can use the militia or armed forces to suppress "conspiracy," if it is likely that "any part" of the people in a state will be deprived of some constitutional rights, and the state itself refuses to act. Under this statute, the President conceivably could circumvent Article IV. Section 4, of the Constitution even before waiting for state legislatures or state executives to request Federal troops. Under IS USC 1383. the President has authority to declare any part or all of the United States military zones. People in such zones can be jailed for a year for violating any "executive order of the President." Would these arrests be reviewable in court \ It is not clear Judicial review of agency actions is guaranteed in 5 USC 702, but 5 USC 701 excludes actions taken under declarations of martial law.
A President could make use of Public Law 733, which expresses the determination of the United States to prevent "by whatever means may be necessary including the use of arms, any "subversive" activities by the government of Cuba.

Under 47 USC 308, the Federal Communications Commission could, during a NATIONAL EMERGENCY, modify existing broadcast licenses under terms it might prescribe'. Under 47 USC 606, the President can amend "as he sees fit" the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission and, in particular, can "cause the closing of any facility or station for wire communications."

If the President finds the nation "threatened by attack," he could, under 44 USC 1505, cease to publish his regulations in the Federal Register if he determines that it is "impracticable." This could open the way to promulgation of secret laws.


Moreover, no recent comprehensive record of statutes effective during times of EMERGENCY had been compiled. No consistent procedure was being followed in declaring, administering, and terminating states of NATIONAL EMERGENCY. The enlarged task that the Committee confronted led to its being redesignated the Special Committee on NATIONAL EMERGENCIES and DELEGATED EMERGENCY POWERS..." See: report from the Special Committee on NATIONAL EMERGENCIES and DELEGATED EMERGENCY POWERS 1973.

Corporate credit:

What is corporate credit? Most people are unaware of this aspect of money, they are not even aware of how they may acquire such monies, so let’s examine this aspect of currency utilized within the financial arena/market.  

Corporate credit is: Corporate Credit, is credit that is earned and assigned to a corporation or business rather than an individual person. This credit is essential in establishing and maintaining business or banking relationships with potential creditors, vendors, business partners, or even clients. This is because the “credit profile” established by the various credit reporting agencies, and the subsequent credit ratings, are based on your past and current credit history, among other significant factors. This profile and rating system is used by potential creditors, vendors, clients, or business partners to gauge how reliable your company is and whether or not to extend credit to your company, or to engage your company in a business relationship. https://companiesinc.com/grow-your-business/corporate-credit/faq/

It seems nearly impossible for a business to function without some form of credit. Credit options are readily available to any type of business, but there are two distinctive types: business credit and corporate credit. The obvious difference is the corporation status of the company, but the differences do not end there.

Types of Credit

Corporate credit is available through credit cards, lines of credit, bank loans or trade credits. Credit cards, lines of credit and bank loans are available through financial institutions. Trade credit is when established (incorporated) businesses create lines of credit for other established businesses. Business credit is typically only in the form of credit cards. Credit cards for either corporations or businesses bear individual names as well as the business name, but only the latter has credit attached to the individual. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-corporate-business-credit-3701.html

Now, despite the aforementioned information corporate credit and business credit are not the same, they may have similarities, but as everyone knows, a corporation is run by a group of individuals, usually has a board, and a business can be run by a single individual’s, a small group, I trust, and estate, a partnership, a consortium and so forth. Our focus is on corporate status that can be achieved and acquired by an individual. One way an individual can establish corporate credit is by the creation of a legal entity. Often times individuals form a legal entity such as a trust, they will contact the Internal Revenue Service and register that trust with that agency, completing the necessary forms when establishing that trust, but they often do not realize the true potential of such registration and establishment.

For instance, one step entity has been established/created the grantor of that entity or the owner could then get what’s known as business insurance on that entity.

They could get let’s say $500,000 insurance on their newly established corporation/business/trust which now has their business value that $500,000 plus any other assets, expenses, value associated thereto. That very same party would then make an application for a corporate credit card at a local department store, and or similar establishment. That very same party would also choose to operate solely through that entity when making purchases and/or acquisitions so as to establish that name and/or reputation for that newly established entity. Including but not solely limited to adding their personal profile to the corporate credit profile i.e. adding it as a secondary user of a credit card. We in no way are making an attempt to give you financial advice, we are simply explaining what an individual has as options, yet this is not to be construed as a complete list of options.

Once a person has established their Corporation, and is looking to establish credit associated with that Corporation it would benefit them to do research on how to be listed as an exempt corporation without listing themselves as a religious organization such as a 501 (c) (3). There is a lot/great deal of advice on the Internet, you will need to be very careful as to where you acquire such information associated with the aforementioned. YouTube can sometimes be a great source for research purposes, however, YouTube can also be a horrible source for information, because often times misleading, inaccurate, and deceptive information is provided because individuals simply do not take the time to research the information for themselves from sources outside of YouTube, please be aware of these complications. 

Acquisition of Securities.


17 CFR 240.13d-5 - Acquisition of securities.
eCFR
Authorities (U.S. Code)
Rulemaking
§ 240.13d-5 Acquisition of securities.
(a) A person who becomes a beneficial owner of securities shall be deemed to have acquired such securities for purposes of section 13(d)(1) of the Act, whether such acquisition was through purchase or otherwise. However, executors or administrators of a decedent's estate generally will be presumed not to have acquired beneficial ownership of the securities in the decedent's estate until such time as such executors or administrators are qualified under local law to perform their duties.

(b)

(1) When two or more persons agree to act together for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting or disposing of equity securities of an issuer, the group formed thereby shall be deemed to have acquired beneficial ownership, for purposes of sections 13(d) and (g) of the Act, as of the date of such agreement, of all equity securities of that issuer beneficially owned by any such persons.

(2) Notwithstanding the previous paragraph, a group shall be deemed not to have acquired any equity securities beneficially owned by the other members of the group solely by virtue of their concerted actions relating to the purchase of equity securities directly from an issuer in a transaction not involving a public offering: Provided, That:

(i) All the members of the group are persons specified in Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii);

(ii) The purchase is in the ordinary course of each member's business and not with the purpose nor with the effect of changing or influencing control of the issuer, nor in connection with or as a participant in any transaction having such purpose or effect, including any transaction subject to Rule 13d-3(b);

(iii) There is no agreement among, or between any members of the group to act together with respect to the issuer or its securities except for the purpose of facilitating the specific purchase involved; and

(iv) The only actions among or between any members of the group with respect to the issuer or its securities subsequent to the closing date of the non-public offering are those which are necessary to conclude ministerial matters directly related to the completion of the offer or sale of the securities.

(Secs. 3(b), 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), 13(d)(5), 13(d)(6), 14(d)(1), 23; 48 Stat. 882, 894, 895, 901; sec. 203(a), 49 Stat. 704, sec. 8, 49 Stat. 1379; sec. 10, 78 Stat. 88a; secs. 2, 3, 82 Stat. 454, 455; secs. 1, 2, 3-5, 84 Stat. 1497; secs. 3, 18, 89 Stat. 97, 155 ( 15 U.S.C. 78c(b), 78m(d)(1), 89m(d)(2), 78m(d)(5), 78m(d)(6), 78n(d)(1), 78w))

Mobirise

The Hanging Gardens of Babylon: a look into the distant past-

A place that was considered one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World is called the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, which is located in southern Iraq. Coming from the rough Greek translation, kremastos, or the Latin word pensilis, the Hanging Gardens of Babylon name is interpreted to be like a balcony or terrace that can be seen as “overhanging”, not just “hanging".

A Neo-Babylon King, King Nebu-cha'd- nezzar II, who ruled for 43 years starting in 605 BC is one credited for the story behind this special place. The story says that he built the Hanging Gardens for his wife at the time, Queen Amytis, who was homesick. She had mentioned to him that she missed the green hills, valleys, and mountains of her homeland. King Nebuchadnezzar II decided to create an artificial/man-made mountain filled with beautiful gardens of flowers overhanging on the palace roofs, terraces, and balconies to beautify the palace. It was said that the gardens had a height of approximately 75 feet, and had ripe fruit and a variety of exotic animals, although there is no way to verify this information because the nation of Babylon was invaded, and conquered by the Medo Persian Empire in one night without a single arrow being shot. Interestingly, there were investigators who claimed to uncover an ancient hydraulic water system that would pump water from the river, as Babylon was surrounded by remote, and the diverting of waterways during that period of time was common.

Although it has been said that the Hanging Gardens of Babylon was a myth, Dr. Stephanie Dalleyhim him, a retired British Research Fellow in Assyriology from Cambridge University, disagrees, as she spent many years investigating the Hanging Gardens of Babylon and records associated with the legend. She proposed that the gardens were situated in Nineveh, an ancient Assyrian capital city of Upper Mesopotamia in northern Iraq. Dr. Dalley interpreted Assyrian cuneiform, which was one of the earliest systems of writing, and came to a conclusion that the gardens were not built at Babylon under King Nebuchadnezzar II, but instead by Sennacherib - who was the king of Assyria from 705 BCE to 681 BCE. She unveiled some of Sennacherib’s writings about a palace he built and a garden alongside that he called a “wonder for all people”. However, this is a theory as they were not called the hanging Gardens of Assyria, but the hanging Gardens of Babylon. Plus the Assyrian nation was defeated initially by the mysterious loss of 185,000+ troops, who mysteriously died, which in turn resulted in the disgrace of the Assyrian king's Sennacherib, who was killed by his two sons as a result of the embarrassment caused the nation by the loss of the 185,000 troops under his reign.

Others speculate that the gardens might have been the work of semi-legendary Queen Sammu-ramat (which is in Greek Smiramis). Titus Flavius Josephus, who was a first-century Romano-Jewish scholar, historian and hagiographer, quoted and credited the reign of King Nebuchadnezzar II with the construction of the Hanging Gardens. there are historical records which shows that the gardens were in existence in 607 B.C. and that it continued to about the year 237 B.C.

Sadly written, the gardens were supposedly destroyed in 209 B.C. by war,as after the Medo Persian Empire had conquered Babylon in roughly 537 B.C., they were later conquered by Alexander the great of Mesopotamia, who after a short stint as King, found his kingdom divided amongst his four generals, and the gardens no longer remained as a result of conflicts between fighting nations and erosion. The mysterious Hanging Gardens of Babylon are considered one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World although investigations of its existence continue.  

Mobirise
Close

SATCOMM we are a Securities Acquisition Trust Commission

The SATPAK 1x securities package includes County Filings, with bonuses which are not included in the price, but offered at no additional charge- UCC initial financing one statement Filing is just one example...

Mobirise

“What Can SATCOMM Do For You?”

“What Can SATCOMM Do For You?”

As goes our Acronym here at SATCOMM we are a Securities Acquisition Trust Commission. We assist our clients in gaining control of their securities as well as improving their financial standing - putting our clients in a better position to operate in the field of finance and business. SATCOMM offers a securities packages called "SATPAK's" in particularly the SatPak1, in which will assist clients in setting up a strong financial base in which they can control, grow, and thrive from.

Where does one begin? It can be an intimidating task for any one individual to go blindly through the entire process of documenting their attainment of the age of majority in order to assume access to their securities.

Mobirise

How SATCOMM helps you

SATCOMM helps by taking on this task for you, creating securities where we increase the value of your investment at our expense initially and then at the expense of other investors if you deem such necessary.

SATCOMM obtains the documents necessary to show an individual’s interest or ownership rights in their securities, and also uses that documentation to create an initial securities. This is followed by correctly filling out and filing these documents with the correct agencies, properly registering with these agencies as required by statutory provisions of law.

The SATPAK 1 securities package includes Memorialization of the Birth Certificate, County Filings, with bonuses which are not included in the price, but offered at no additional charge- UCC initial financing one statement Filings, Fed Record Filings, the setup of our client’s Foreign Tax-Exempt Entity, Foundational Trust Security Incorporation, and so much more. 

The SAT-Fire NewsLeTTer
Inspiring Thought and Imagination



Welcome to our NewsLeTTer, we are delighted that you've visited us, please click on one of the links below to visit our OFFICIAL INFORMATIVE NewsLeTTers.

December 2017


January 2018

February 2018

March 2018

April 2018


May 2018

June 2018

July 2018

August 2018

September 2018


October 2018

November 2018

December 2018